History of International Sanctions against Iran
Economic sanctions between nations are imposed based on the seventh chapter of the United Nations Charter by the United Nations Security Council.
According to the seventh chapter of the United Nations Charter, the Security Council has significant and broad powers to evaluate decisions made in situations of “threat to international peace, breach of peace, or acts of aggression” at a global level.
After accurately stating the legal status of a situation and accepting it as a threat to peace or a violation of peace or an aggressive act, the Security Council first takes temporary measures (non-military decisions) to prevent the situation from becoming more complicated. Then, if necessary, it can consider penalties such as complete or partial cessation of economic relations, ground, air, sea, postal, telegraphic, wireless, and other means of communication, as well as severing diplomatic relations, and all member states are obligated to implement them.
The first experience of sanctions against Iran by Western countries, specifically America, dates back to before the revolution and the first term of Prime Minister Dr. Mossadegh. At that time, the countries of America and England, in response to the nationalization of the oil industry, refrained from buying Iranian oil and the United Nations Security Council issued a resolution against Iran.
The sanctions of America and the international community continued after the 1357 Iranian Revolution for various reasons, and although it was accompanied by many ups and downs, it ultimately led to the referral of Iran’s nuclear case to the United Nations Security Council.
The closure of the American embassy in Iran in the first months after the revolution led to the severing of diplomatic relations between the two countries and the beginning of US sanctions against Iran. The US also blocked Iranian assets worth $12 billion, including gold, bank deposits, and other properties. US officials claim that most of these assets were released in exchange for the release of American hostages, but according to Iranian officials, assets worth $10 billion are still blocked. Although American officials mention a much lower value for the blocked Iranian assets.
We can see the history, reasons, and scope of the most important sanctions imposed against the Islamic Republic after the 1357 Revolution in the table below:
Date. |
Reasons for imposing sanctions. |
The scope of sanctions. |
1981-1979. 1981-1979. |
The hostage crisis and occupation of the American embassy in Tehran. |
Freezing all of Iran’s assets in America and failure to deliver purchased equipment from America. |
1983-1987. |
The explosion at the American military base in Beirut and the Islamic Republic being accused of supporting international terrorism. |
Prohibition of granting loans and facilities to Iran, prohibition of issuing spare parts and equipment to Iran, sanctions on the import of Iranian oil from America. |
1991-1989. |
Iran’s accusation of attempting to obtain and acquire chemical and biological weapons. |
Sanctions on the export of materials and equipment related to chemical and biological weapons. |
October 1992. |
Iran’s access to advanced military weapon technology. |
Sanctions on the export of dual-use goods to Iran, cancellation of the Congo contract. |
May 1993. |
The threat to America’s interests in the Persian Gulf by the Islamic Republic. |
The Dual Containment Strategy of Iran and Iraq. |
May 1995. |
Iran’s interference against establishing peace in the Middle East, support for terrorism, and efforts to acquire weapons of mass destruction. |
Comprehensive sanctions are imposed in all areas of trade and investment. |
August 1996. |
Support and financial backing for terrorism, European companies investing in Iran. |
Approval of the ILA Law: Prohibition of investment of more than 40 million dollars in the oil and gas industries of Iran by all countries and companies. |
2002-2001. (This is a date range, so it does not have a direct translation. It could mean “from 2002 to 2001” or “2002-2001” in English.) |
The accusation against Iran is based on sheltering terrorists, coming to fruition with the emergence of Bush. |
Extension of the ELSA law, introducing Iran as the axis of evil. |
2006-2005. (This is a date range, so it does not have a direct translation. It could mean “from 2006 to 2005” or “2006 and 2005” depending on the context.) |
Iran’s efforts to acquire nuclear weapons. |
The decision to refer Iran’s nuclear report to the Security Council will be made at the 1+5 group meeting in London. |
September 2006. |
Support for Hezbollah in Lebanon and terrorism. |
Sanctions on Export Bank. |
January 2007. |
Financial support for the production of weapons of mass slaughter. |
Sanction on Sepah Bank of Iran. |
June 2007. |
The pursuit of obtaining weapons of mass destruction. |
Sanctions against 27 individuals and organizations from Iran. |
October 2007. |
Supporting terrorism. |
Sanctions on the Quds Force and the National Bank of Iran. |
September 2008. |
Nuclear program monitoring. |
Sanctions on trading with Iranian shipping and airlines. |
October 2008. |
Tracking Iran’s nuclear and military program. |
The European Union has imposed sanctions on Iran’s Export Development Bank. |
September 2010. |
Violation of human rights by the Iranian government. |
Restrictions on the Revolutionary Guards, freezing of assets and interests of sanctioned individuals, prohibition of financial transactions and issuance of visas for individuals. |
2011. |
Iran’s insistence on pursuing its nuclear program. |
Sanctions on the Central Bank of Iran and all its monetary and financial activities. |
December 2011. |
Iran’s insistence on pursuing its nuclear program. |
Sanction of 180 individuals and Iranian companies by the European Union. |
In addition to the cases mentioned in the above table, in January 2012, after the sanctions on the Central Bank of Iran, the oil sanctions on Iran were also put on the agenda of Western countries, both directly and indirectly; the direct method being the sanction on purchasing oil and the sanction on buyers, and the indirect methods including insurance sanctions on oil tankers and banking sanctions. With the implementation of oil sanctions on Iran, importing countries gradually reduced their oil imports from Iran and in some cases replaced it with other producers.
In March 2012, Swift company also terminated all its collaborations with Iranian parties and banks, while about ninety percent of Iran’s foreign trade was being conducted through Swift. The impact of the oil sanctions on Iran was such that in addition to reducing the production and sale of oil in August 2013, it was announced that Iran would not have access to half of its oil sales revenue.
Sanctions against Iran continue, both by the international community and by the United States and the European Union. In the latest development in August 2013, just two days after the start of sanctions on Iran’s shipping industry, the Foreign Affairs Committee of the US House of Representatives sent a letter to President Obama, requesting further sanctions against Iran.
Monthly magazine number 29