Fashion and clothing, as one of the most prominent manifestations of material culture, have always played a significant role in the social and individual structures of societies. In Iran, from the past to the present, fashion and clothing have not merely served as tools for covering the body or reflecting social status. Instead, they have evolved into one of the key components of expressing individual and group identities.

Fashion is no longer confined to aesthetic choices but functions as a cultural, social, and even psychological tool in shaping identities and redefining personal and collective boundaries. Simultaneously, modern Iranian history demonstrates how clothing—particularly uniforms—has become a tool for standardizing individuals and groups over time. From the introduction of uniforms in educational and governmental institutions to establish social order and demarcate societal distinctions, to periods when uniforms symbolized specific religious and cultural identities, their meaning has continually transformed.

This article delves into the relationship between fashion, distinctive attire, and uniforms in Iran. It aims to illustrate how clothing choices in Iran—from open-front coats to unique patterns and colors—have become tools for expressing individual and social identities. It also considers how uniforms in Iran have functioned not only as mechanisms for social standardization but also as symbols of cultural and social identity. With Iran’s cultural and social changes, fashion and uniforms have become integral to more complex processes, where the politics of standardization and identity formation coexist, contributing to redefining social roles and boundaries.

Uniforms: Standardization or Identity Formation?

Uniforms have historically been an inseparable part of human societies, particularly where group identity plays a fundamental role. Uniforms have signified distinctions (e.g., in religious communities), social status (such as rulers, aristocrats, social classes, those in positions of power, or those under subjugation), and membership in groups (like citizens, tribes, or parties). Historically, uniforms were not merely tools of subjugation or obedience but became ideological instruments. They imbued individuals with distinct personas and fostered a collective presence. Uniforms shaped behaviors—both physical and mental—including movement, posture, aesthetic sensibilities, and the inculcation of new social habits.

In the transition from ancient to modern societies, uniforms played a significant role, often introducing new customs and behaviors aimed at distinguishing specific groups from others. In practice, these changes resulted in societies with new and varied social behaviors and interactions. Over time, uniform reforms aligned body movements and postures with clothing, reflecting a new sense of public space, emerging communication styles among social groups, and evolving aesthetics.

Colors gained increasing significance, distinguishing various units and balancing dominant shades, often white, khaki, blue, or red. Decorations and trims took on diverse hues, and although the range of permitted colors narrowed over time, a complex hierarchy persisted regarding who could wear specific colors, fabrics, or garments.

In Iran, uniforms have played various roles in shaping individual and collective identities across different historical eras. From ancient times to the contemporary period, uniforms have functioned not only as tools for maintaining social order and controlling appearances but also as symbols of collective, political, and cultural identities.

During the Qajar and Pahlavi eras, uniforms were primarily designed as instruments of social and cultural standardization. They were meticulously crafted in government and military institutions to project the authority of the state and delineate clear social hierarchies. Under the Pahlavi regime, uniforms symbolized a modern, centralized government striving to control all social strata and create a unified national identity. Whether in schools or government and military institutions, these uniforms implicitly conveyed a sense of conformity, requiring individuals within the system to adhere to specific, uniform standards.

However, after the 1979 Islamic Revolution, the concept of standardization underwent significant transformations. Uniforms in schools and other public institutions became tools to represent Islamic and revolutionary identities. School uniforms, particularly for girls, were designed with specific colors and styles to align with new cultural and religious principles. The use of the chador and hijab alongside school uniforms reflected efforts to redefine Iranian national and religious identity based on Islamic principles.

During this period, uniforms became instruments not only for enforcing social order and individual discipline but also for constructing new collective and individual identities. School uniforms fostered a sense of collective identity, symbolizing not only national unity but also belonging to a shared cultural-religious project. Uniforms simultaneously represented conformity while serving as tools for expressing new and distinct Iranian cultural identities.

In other spheres, such as military and governmental institutions, uniforms remained symbols of power and authority. However, they were redesigned with new colors and distinctive details to foster a renewed collective and cultural identity among individuals in these institutions. Uniforms no longer solely signified rank and social status; they also symbolized affiliation with a specific Iranian-Islamic collective identity.

Throughout Iran’s modern history, uniforms have reflected transformations at both individual and collective levels, simultaneously advancing the politics of standardization and identity formation. These processes reveal that uniforms in Iran, contrary to initial appearances, have not only been tools for establishing order and discipline but have also been instruments for expressing new social and political ideologies and identities.

From Open-Front Coats to Glitter

Fashion in Iran has now evolved into a phenomenon far more complex than mere aesthetic choices. Clothing is no longer solely a means of covering the body or signaling social status; it has become a silent yet powerful language for expressing individual identity, redefining gender roles, and even voicing discontent with social and cultural structures.

In a context where social and political restrictions have constrained many avenues of expression, fashion serves as a quiet realm of freedom, capable of conveying intricate and meaningful social, individual, and even political messages. Iran’s younger generation, through distinctive clothing choices and creative combinations, seeks not only to redefine individual identities but also to instigate cultural and social changes.

Colors and patterns have taken on greater social significance in this generation’s attire. Black and white, often symbols of dissent against prevailing conditions, or vibrant, energetic colors that signify the zest for life and hope, implicitly convey profound reflections on social realities and cultural shifts. These color choices not only highlight individuality but also signify social solidarity and collective resolve.

The open-front coat, one of the most prominent symbols of social change in Iran, transcends its role as a fashion choice to become a cultural and social tool. In opposition to traditional and conservative models, this garment challenges gender and social norms. Its freer design and break from conventional styles signify personal liberties and a rejection of imposed gender roles in society.

Similarly, glitter—once reserved for festive occasions—has emerged as a key element of modern fashion, symbolizing individual freedom and a zest for life. Glitter now appears in everyday styles, reflecting rebellion, vibrancy, and a desire to transcend societal boundaries. In public spaces, especially where emotional expression is often curtailed, glitter acts as a medium for showcasing freedom of choice and individual identity in a society that sometimes restricts personal expression.

From open-front coats to glitter, these shifts in fashion reflect not only individual and aesthetic preferences but also broader cultural and social transformations. These styles and varying modes of dress serve as tools for asserting individuality and freedom of choice while fostering new connections and breaking social and cultural barriers. This trend subtly transforms concepts of identity and social belonging, with fashion serving as a dynamic and universal language, actively redefining these notions.

From Order to Freedom?

Clothing has always been a part of individual and social identity. Yet, in the journey from order to freedom, it has become more than a tool for conforming to norms. In the past, clothing was often used to ensure social alignment and maintain order. Today, however, attire has evolved into a dynamic space for self-expression, identity definition, and even resistance to restrictions.

Every clothing choice can be a statement of individuality, beliefs, and even opposition to societal structures. From formal wear to casual, personal styles, each form of attire represents a step toward personal freedoms where individuals can use any piece of fabric as a means of self-expression.

In this context, clothing transcends being merely an aesthetic choice or adherence to fashion. Today’s fashion reflects a move toward individual freedoms that go beyond traditional boundaries, creating space for new identities to emerge. Clothes are no longer just for covering the body or conforming to social norms; they are tools for creating new, free spaces for oneself. Contemporary fashion choices signify individual differences and mark a social transformation where individuals can redefine their identities within the collective gaze of society.

References

1. Crane, D. (2000). Fashion and its social agendas: Class, gender, and identity in clothing. University of Chicago Press.
2. Hebdige, D. (1979). Subculture: The meaning of style (1st ed.). Methuen. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203139943
3. Maynard, M. (2006). Dress for dissent: Reading the almost unreadable. Journal of Australian Studies, 30(89), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/14443050609388096